Process Costing

This lesson focuses on Process Costing. There are two main types of cost accounting systems. Companies select a method that best matches the flow of work in their business. These methods are used to allocate all production costs: labor, materials and overhead.
Job order costing - work is broken into jobs; each job is tracked separatelyauto mechanics, carpenters, painters, print shops, computer repair
Process costing - a large quantity of identical or similar products are mass producedauto assembly plants, hot dog manufacturing, any large mechanized production facility
Each cost accounting system gathers and reports on the same information. The method used depends on the needs of the business.
Process Costing traces and accumulates direct costs, and allocates indirect costs, through a manufacturing process. Costs are assigned to products, usually in a large batch, which might include an entire month's production. Eventually, costs have to be allocated to individual units of product.

Why do we need to allocate total product costs to units of product?

A company may manufacture thousands or millions of units of product in a given period of time.
  • products are manufactured in large quantities, but,
  • products must be sold in small quantities, sometimes one at a time (automobiles, loaves of bread), a dozen or two at a time (eggs, cookies), etc.
  • product costs must be transferred from Finished Goods to Cost of Goods Sold as sales are made. This requires a correct and accurate accounting of product costs per unit, to have a proper matching of product costs against related sales revenue.
  • managers need to maintain cost control over the manufacturing process. Process costing provides managers with feedback that can be used to compare similar product costs from one month to the next, keeping costs in line with projected manufacturing budgets. 
  • a fraction-of-a-cent cost change can represent a large dollar change in overall profitability, when selling millions of units of product a month. Managers must carefully watch per unit costs on a daily basis through the production process, while at the same time dealing with materials and output in huge quantities.

Allocating Overhead Using ABC Costing

Overhead is a large mixed group of costs that can't be directly traced to products. There are several methods of allocating overhead costs in a cost accounting system. ABC costing is one method. There are other, simpler methods as well.
Activity-based costing (ABC) - overhead costs are tracked activities that consume resourcesUsed primarily for allocating overhead that is hard to track to specific products or departments
ABC Costing is a little more sophisticated that the single-driver method covered in the lesson on job costing. But it is really not much more difficult. ABC Costing assumes that:
  • you may have more than one cost driver that is relevant,
  • a single cost driver may incorrectly allocate costs to products or departments -- too much or too little costs, or costs allocated to the wrong department or product,
  • service type enterprises don't produce a product, but must find a way to allocate overhead costs to services provided (e.g. hospitals),
  • multi-department and multi-factory situations require more sophistocated overhead allocation methods.

Two-Stage Overhead Allocation

Stage 1
Stage 2
Allocate Total Costs to Pools
Allocate Pools to Products or Services
Nagle Manufacturing has identified 3 cost pools, each with a relevant driver. They can trace total overhead costs as follows.
Total overhead costs broken into cost pools
Using separate cost pools and drivers, Nagle Manufacturing can allocate total overhead costs more accurately to the products that consume those costs.
EXAMPLE - Occupancy Cost Pool allocation
A factory
Factory overhead
Mike's Bikes, Inc. decides to allocate factory Occupancy costs based on the square footage each department occupies. Occupancy costs include many common costs, like heat, air conditioning, water & sewer, lights, cleaning and maintenance, insurance, security and other related costs.
The company draws up a floor plan and measures how many square feet each department uses.
They had a total of $120,000 in Occupancy costs last year.
The company produced 6000 bicycles last year.
Occupancy Cost Pool Overhead Allocation
Department
Sq ft
Cost allocation formula
Allocated
to depts
Bicycles made
Overhead Per Bike
Assembly
5,000
 / 15,000 * $120,000 =
$40,000
/ 6000 =
$  6.67
Finishing
7,000
 / 15,000 * $120,000 =
56,000
/ 6000 =
9.33
Sales & admin
   3,000
 / 15,000 * $120,000 =
   24,000
/ 6000 =
   4.00
Total
15,000
$120,000
/ 6000 =
$ 20.00
NOTE: Only Assembly and Finishing costs are considered Product costs. Product costs become part of the cost of Finished Goods, which flows to Cost of Goods Sold. Sales and administrative costs are treated as Period costs against related revenue for the same time period, one year in this case. It's important to consider ALL costs when pricing a product.

Equivalent Units of Production

This is a concept that seems to confuse students. Don't worry, after working with the concepts for a couple of years they become much easier. Just kidding! But honestly, it is a difficult concept the first time or two around. Your success with this topic will largely depend on taking your time, and carefully working and reviewing a number of sample problems.
Equivalent units are mainly used in process accounting systems, but the method could also be used in a job order system. Equivalent unit calculations are used at the end of a month, to prepare monthly production reports. They are also used at the end of the year to determine ending inventory values.
The Equivalent Unit concept has to do with costs incurred, in the form of materialslabor and overhead. Let's say it costs the company $50 to produce 1 bicycle.
1/2 bike
+
1/2 bike
=
1 whole bike
Half of a bicycle
PLUS
Half of a bicycle
EQUIVALENT TO
Bicycle
$25
+
$25
=
$50
Let's say at the end of a day, two bikes are half completed, and have accumulated $25 in costs each. That is the same as one equivalent unit which has accumulated $50 in costs.
Using equivalents unit is a way to mathematically convert partially completed units of product into an equivalent number of fully completed units. Let's look at an example:
1000 units of Product X are 50% complete at the end of the month. We convert them into equivalent units as follows:
1000 units X 50% complete = 500 equivalent units
If they were 25% complete this would be the calculation:
1000 units X 25% complete = 250 equivalent units
So equivalent unit calculation is just a way to convert partly complete products into their equivalent number of fully completed products, using a little math. Remember, this is accounting; we are recording and reporting on costs, and trying to have the costs parallel the actual flow of production through the manufacturing process.
Let's look at a furniture company. They are producing a batch of 1000 wooden chairs. The wood is cut and shaped into component parts. The parts are sanded and assembled. Next paint or varnish is applied, and decorations and hardware are added. Under these circumstances, a batch of 1000 chairs could be at any stage of the production process at the end of a month. Using equivalent units would be appropriate in this example.
Of course, this doesn't make sense in every situation. Let's take a cookie bakery. They mix a batch of dough, bake the cookies, and package them all on the same day. There is no carry over of partially completed cookies from one day to the next. This company would not need to calculate equivalent units of production.

Unit Costs

A manufacturing company can make thousands of units of product in a given time periods. Some make millions of units per year. Ultimately those products have to be sold, and they are sold one at a time. So it is important for companies to know the unit cost of the products. This unit cost should include all costs when setting a selling price.
We can also analyze our production efficiency by looking at how unit costs change from month to month. We can break unit costs down into component parts as well, such as labor, material and overhead. This gives managers even more control over the manufacturing process.
We will study standard costs and budgets in a later lesson. Unit costs are very important in both of these areas. By comparing standard and actual costs per unit we can reduce waste, increase productivity, and manager resources more carefully.

Using ABC Costing Systems

Overhead costs are not treated as a single item in ABC systems. Costs are pooled by type or activity, and allocated to production using different cost drivers.
It is important to identify relevant and reliable cost drivers for different types of costs. For instance, square footage of floor space might be used to allocate heating and air conditioning costs. Costs usually go through a series of steps in the allocation process.

Just In Time Inventory Management

Just in time (JIT) inventory management systems have been widely used in the automotive manufacturing and assembly industry, as well as others. The idea is to have parts arrive at the assembly plant just in time to go into the production line when they are needed. The company does not keep an inventory of parts in storage. Very few extras are ordered, further eliminating waste.
JIT systems help companies in several ways. They reduce costs and risks associated with inventory. There is no need to warehouse parts, eliminating building, personnel and insurance costs. They reduce the risk of loss from damage, theft, obsolescence of inventory.
There's no difference in the accounting procedures associated with JIT systems. They are a way to manage the physical flow of inventory.

Using Spreadsheet Programs for Managerial Accounting

Spreadsheet programs (Excel, Lotus 1-2-3) are widely used in managerial accounting. The are very helpful for calculating ABC cost allocations. Standardized formulae can be entered into a spreadsheet. When monthly information is entered, the formulae do all the math, and calculate the final cost allocations.
A spreadsheet can be used to calculate equivalent units of production in a process costing system. They are also widely used in preparing budgets, performing incremental analysis calculations, and in C-V-P analysis for calculating break even points and creating graphs.

Types of Process Costing


There are three types of process costing, which are:
  1. Weighted average costs.  This version assumes that all costs, whether from a preceding period or the current one, are lumped together and assigned to produced units.  It is the simplest version to calculate.
  2. Standard costs. This version is based on standard costs.  Its calculation is similar to weighted average costing, but standard costs are assigned to production units, rather than actual costs; after total costs are accumulated based on standard costs, these totals are compared to actual accumulated costs, and the difference is charged to a variance account.
  3. First-in first-out costing (FIFO).  FIFO is a more complex calculation that creates layers of costs, one for any units of production that were started in the previous production period but not completed, and another layer for any production that is started in the current period.
There is no last in, first out (LIFO) costing method used in process costing, since the underlying assumption of process costing is that the  first unit produced is, in fact, the first unit used, which is the FIFO concept.
Why have three different cost calculation methods for process costing, and why use one version instead of another?  The different calculations are required for different cost accounting needs.  The weighted average method is used in situations where there is no standard costing system, or where the fluctuations in costs from period to period are so slight that the management team has no need for the slight improvement in costing accuracy that can be obtained with the FIFO costing method.  Alternatively, process costing that is based on standard costs is required for costing systems that use standard costs.  It is also useful in situations where companies manufacture such a broad mix of products that they have difficulty accurately assigning actual costs to each type of product; under the other process costing methodologies, which both use actual costs, there is a strong chance that costs for different products will become mixed together.  Finally, FIFO costing is used when there are ongoing and significant changes in product costs from period to period – to such an extent that the management team needs to know the new costing levels so that it can re-price products appropriately, determine if there are internal costing problems requiring resolution, or perhaps to change manager performance-based compensation.  In general, the simplest costing approach is the weighted average method, with FIFO costing being the most difficult.
Cost Flow in Process Costing
The typical manner in which costs flow in process costing is that direct material costs are added at the beginning of the process, while all other costs (both direct labor and overhead) are gradually added over the  course of the production process. For example, in a food processing operation, the direct material (such as a cow) is added at the beginning of the operation, and then various rendering operations gradually convert the direct material into finished products (such as steaks).

Process Costing – FIFO Method

Process Costing – FIFO Method


Under the FIFO method of process costing, costs are transferred to next department and ultimately to finished goods in the order in which they entered the current department i.e. costs entering first are transferred first and hence the name FIFO–first-in-first-out.
Unlike the weighted average method, the FIFO method does not involve any averaging out of the total costs incurred during a period. It moves the cost of beginning work in process (including the costs incurred in current period) straight to cost of units transferred out and distributes the costs added during the period first to the cost of units transferred out and the rest to the cost of units in the ending work in process.
FIFO method involves following steps, majority of which are the same as in weighted average method:
  • Preparing the quantity schedule: i.e. reconciling units in the beginning work in process, units added/started during the period, units transferred out and units in ending WIP.
  • Bringing forward the cost of ending WIP of last period as cost of beginning work in process of the current period.
  • Bringing forward the percentage of completion of the ending WIP of last period.
  • Finding the costs brought forward from previous department and cost added in the current department under different heads: direct materials and conversion costs.
  • Finding units started/added and completed during the current period.
  • Finding total equivalent units.
  • Finding cost per equivalent unit for each cost component.
  • Allocating the cost between units transferred out and ending WIP.

Example

Let us use the same example as in the article on process costing under weighted average method.
Prepare a cost of production report for the packaging department of Company ABC for the month of December 2013 under FIFO method of process costing. Important information is reproduced here.
  • 20,000 units in work in process as at 1 December: $20,000 of direct materials and $40,000 of conversion costs (i.e. $10,000 direct labor and $30,000 manufacturing overheads). 100% of the direct materials cost and 40% of the conversion cost have been incurred in last period on these units.
  • 200,000 units transferred in from production department during the month: at a total cost of $555,000.
  • Costs added included: direct materials of $22,000 and conversion costs of $20,000.
  • 180,000 units transferred to finished goods.
  • 40,000 units in work in process as at 31 December: 100% complete as to costs transferred-in, 80% complete as to materials and 50% complete as to conversion costs.
Solution
The first step is the preparation of quantity schedule.
As at 1 December20,000
Transferred in200,000
Units to be accounted for220,000
Transferred out from units from 1 December20,000
Units both started and completed during the current period160,000
Units transferred out180,000
As at 31 December40,000
Units accounted for220,000
Now, calculate the equivalent units:
Transferred-
in
Direct
Materials
Conversion
Costs
Units in beginning WIP (A)020,00020,000
% of completion of beginning WIP in previous period (B)0%100%40%
% of beginning WIP completed this period [C=100%-B]100%0%60%
Equivalent units in beginning WIP [D=A×C]--12,000
Units both started and completed in current period (E)160,000160,000160,000
Units of ending WIP (F)40,00040,00040,000
Percentage of completion of ending WIP (G)100%80%50%
Equivalent units in ending WIP (H=F×G)40,00032,00020,000
Total equivalent units (D+E+H)200,000192,000192,000
Next, find cost per equivalent unit.
Transferred-
in
Direct
Materials
Conversion
Costs
Total
Costs (I)$555,000$22,000$20,000$597,000
Total equivalent units (J)200,000192,000192,000
Cost per equivalent unit (I/J)$2.775$0.1146$0.1042$2.993
We need to find the cost of units transferred out. Since we are using FIFO method, we first include the entire beginning WIP in the cost of units transferred out and then include units started/added during the period.
Cost of beginning WIP brought forward from last period (K)$60,000
Transferred-in costs [(100%-100%)*20,000*2.775] (L)$-
Direct materials [(100%-100%)*20,000*0.1146] (M)$-
Conversion costs [(100%-40%)*20,000*0.1042] (N)$1,250
Cost incurred on beginning WIP in current period (O=L+M+N)$1,250
Beginning WIP (P=K+O)$61,250
Cost of units started and completed in current period (2.993*160,000) (Q)$479,000
Cost of units transferred out (P+Q)$540,250
Cost of units in ending work in process comes from units added during the period:
Transferred-
in
Direct
Materials
Conversion
Costs
Total
Units as at 31 December (R)40,00040,00040,00040,000
Cost per equivalent unit (S)$2.775$0.1146$0.1042$2.993
Percentage of completion (T)100%80%50%
Total cost (R×S×T)$111,000$3,667$2,083$116,750
It can also be calculated using the short-cut formula given below
Cost of ending WIP =
Cost of Beginning WIP + Costs Transferred-in + Costs Added in Current Department − Costs Transferred-out
Value of ending WIP based on this formula is:
Cost of ending WIP = $60,000 + $555,0000 + $42,000 − $540, 250 = 116,750
We can summarize the cost movement using the cost schedule given below:
Cost to be accounted forAccounted for as
Beginning WIP60000Transferred out540,250
Cost transferred in555000Closing WIP116,750
Cost added
Materials22000
Conversion20000
42000
Total657000Total657,000

Product Plannnig & Development Process

Product Planning and Development: Top 7 Steps

This article throws light upon the seven main steps in product planning and development. The steps are: 1. Generation of New Product Ideas 2. Screening of Ideas 3. Product Concept Development 4. Commercial Feasibility 5. Product Development 6. Test Marketing 7. Commercialisation.

Product Planning and Development Step # 1. Generation of New Product Ideas:

The first step in product planning and development is generation of ideas for the development of new/innovative products.
Ideas may come from internal sources like company’s own Research and Development (R&D) department, managers, sales-force personnel etc.; or from external sources like, customers, dealers, competitors, consultants, scientists etc.
At this stage, the intention of management is to generate more and more new and better product ideas; so that the most practical and profitable ideas may be screened subsequently.

Product Planning and Development Step # 2. Screening of Ideas:

Screening of ideas means a close and detailed examination of ideas, to determine which of the ideas have potential and are capable of making significant contribution to marketing objectives. In fact, generation of ideas is not that significant as the system for screening the generated ideas.
The ideas should be screened properly; as any idea passing this stage would cost the firm in terms of time, money and efforts, at subsequent stages in product planning and development.

Product Planning and Development Step # 3. Product Concept Development:

Those product ideas which clear the screening stage must be developed into a product concept – identifying physical features, benefits, price etc. of the product. At this stage product idea is transformed into a product concept i.e. a product which target market will accept.

Product Planning and Development Step # 4. Commercial Feasibility:

At this stage, the purpose is to determine whether the proposed product idea is commercially feasible, in terms of demand potential and the costs of production and marketing. Management must also ensure that product concept is compatible with the resources of the organization technological, human and financial.

Product Planning and Development Step # 5. Product Development:

Product development encompasses the technical activities of engineering and design. At this stage, the engineering department converts the product concept into a concert form of product in view of the required size, shape, design, weight, colour etc. of the product concept.
A model or prototype of the product is manufactured on a limited scale. Decisions are also made with regard to packaging, brand name, label etc. of the product.

Product Planning and Development Step # 6. Test Marketing:

A sample of the product is tested in a well-chosen and authentic sales environment; to find out consumers’ reaction. In view of consumers’ reactions, the product may be improved further.

Product Planning and Development Step # 7. Commercialisation:

After the management is satisfied with the results of test marketing, steps are taken to launch a full-fledged programme for the production, promotion and marketing of the product. It is the stage where the new product is born; and it enters it life cycle process.